Case Study

Biodiversity Assessment for New Subdivision

Client

Oak Property Investments

Location

Muswellbrook, NSW

Project Date

2024-2025

A quiet suburban street curves through a modern neighborhood with neatly manicured lawns, trees, parked cars, and houses featuring light-colored roofs under a blue sky with scattered clouds.
The Challenge

We were engaged to support a residential subdivision project in Muswellbrook by preparing a comprehensive biodiversity assessment in compliance with stringent state and regulations. Our team conducted detailed surveys and analysis to assess the presence of threatened species and mapped key ecological habitats. By identifying areas of both sensitive and low biodiversity values early, we helped avoid unnecessary disturbance and preserve important flora and fauna habitat, delivering a practical, regulator-ready solution that supported timely project approval for 56 new residential homes.

Our Solution

We delivered a full-scope ecological assessment for this two-stage residential subdivision in Muswellbrook. Our team undertook comprehensive vegetation and habitat surveys, including targeted threatened species assessments. Our preliminary assessment of potential biodiversity impacts informed the proposed lot layout enabling early avoidance, minimisation of impacts on biodiversity, thereby saving costs by reducing the biodiversity credit offset obligations. Our team also prepared a complete BDAR that met all legislative requirements—supporting the client’s application with rigorous, regulator-ready documentation aligned to NSW planning frameworks and ecological best practice.

The Result

This work demonstrates our capacity to support local-scale projects through rigorous biodiversity impact assessment and reporting in compliance with the NSW planning framework. Our assessment safeguarded critical habitat and threatened species vital to the region’s biodiversity. Following comprehensive fieldwork, vegetation mapping, and impact assessment, our team determined that the development posed no significant risk to biodiversity, resulting in no biodiversity credit obligation. This outcome delivered both ecological confidence and regulatory clarity for the client and the consent authority.